“There might be no excessive civility without morality,” - stated American poet Ralph Waldo Emerson. Indeed, it is exhausting to object that morality and ethics play vital role in human life, being an integral part of our conduct and communication. Whereas making dicisions, we weight all merits and demerits, benefits and drawbacks, opportunities and probable risks, oftentimes relying upon ethical principles. Nevertheless, every particular person has individual vision of morality, sometimes differing from others’. I want to describe my own ethical principles.

We will write a custom essay on Moral Obligation for you!

Allow us to pose a query: Is it my duty to speak up if I see someone being damage, even when it concerned dangers getting hurt? I think that every human being will behave relying on explicit situation. Many factors should be thought of, together with degree of possible danger, circumstances, estimate of hurt the one who's being hurt suffers from, and lots of others. Perhaps, it's really important to assess all these features before making desision whether or not to interfere. Nevertheless, my set of ethical rules offers only one answer to this question no matter circumstances, which is yes. Yes, it is my obligation to speak up if someone is being harm, even if it entails risks getting hurt to myself.
Our democratic and independent society has cultivated the concept of privacy. As a result of this idea, one should not intervene until he is asked for. I believe that this rule may trigger a large number of tragedies in human life, as it's typically acutely essential to act if you end up not asked for. I have always had an exagerrated sense of justice. That's the reason it was never a question for me whether to interfere. I have a strong ethical idea that means, in simple phrases, to assist anybody (be it a human being or animal) even if the possible utility for someone shall be lower than my spendings (be it materials or physical value, an action, or time spent). Of course, if the utility is bigger than my spending (which occurs way more typically), it's much more essential for me to help. I'll never forgive myself if I ignore struggling of others. After all, the risk of getting damage might exist. However, it by no means stopped me, though I did undergo few times from intervention. Nevertheless, as I truly helped any individual with my intervention, my bills (physical or ethical undergo) have been all the time repaid.

“The most popular place in Hell is reserved for many who remain impartial in instances of great ethical conflict,” - I help each word of this phrase of Martin Luther King. I imagine that ignoring anyone who is being harm is nearly a crime. I hate this coverage of non-intervention in keeping with privateness concept. I settle for the only ethical rule that dictates to intervene. Lastly, I assure every individual that it's our readiness to assist each other no matter circumstances that makes us human beings.