The leader of al-Qaida states that the idea to destroy American skyscrapers was born in his head when he noticed destroyed towers of Lebanon: “And as I checked out those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my thoughts that we should always punish the oppressor in type and that we should always destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our ladies and youngsters” (Bin Laden). Osama bin Laden accuses American authorities of anti-democratic actions and reveals that the attainable response might be additionally antidemocratic actions. Terrorist actions for eastern individuals are a form of resistance. One in all Bin Laden’s important rhetorical strategies is an attempt to put the burden of duty on America accusing it in the starting the conflict. He makes his greatest to indicate that Al-Qaida did nothing but only defended his nation from the American terror.

Bin Laden presents knowledge about mass murders of thousands and thousands of individuals in Iraq, where kids and girls, even not talking about men, have been cruelly killed. He emphasizes in his speech that Iraq is a strategic aim for America. He states that Iraq give the U.S. an access to grease and different outrages. This purpose is hidden behind democratic logins. Bush wants to vary the totalitarian regime into democratic one in Iraq but his actions do not show his words.

Bush calls Osama bin Laden and his followers “freedom-haters” and explains their terrorist assaults as aggressive actions in direction of democratic nations. Bin Laden states that his actions aren't terrorist ones and his coverage is oriented on the United States not accidentally: “If so, then let him clarify to us why we don’t strike for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don’t possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - could Allah have mercy on them” (Bin Laden). In Bin Laden’s eyes America is an oppressor of free states who are military as sturdy because the USA itself and so should not in a position to make a resistance.

Osama Bin Laden tries to steer people who the terrorist actions of his group will be justified as a result of they were just a response to the American policy. Terrorist actions can by no means be justified, they are often simply explained. Individuals can see that terrorism has a background and that country’s policy generally does not correspond to the pursuits of different counties and it could actually result in such terrible consequences as terrorist acts. Bin Laden’s information and arguments are exaggerated but, nevertheless, he names basic roots of japanese people’s hatred. America, following democratic goals, often forgets about aims of different countries. Some states, particularly if we converse about the Arabic world, are nonetheless not prepared for the democratic regime and they don't seem to be in a position to settle for such changes. Bush should take it into consideration taking any actions in this course because the reaction of different states might be unpredictable and even tragic for the American society and the events of the September eleventh are a vibrant instance for it. Governmental policy must be fastidiously chosen and should take into consideration all the potential consequences of any actions in order not to endanger folks’s lives.

Osama Bin Laden uses various rhetorical strategies and that's the reason his speech is so convincing and makes folks imagine it. He turns across the information so cunningly that they sound as real ones. Bin Laden characterizes his behaviour because the battle for freedom: “we fight as a result of we're free men who don’t sleep underneath oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, simply as you lay waste to our nation. So lets lay waste to yours” (Bin Laden, 2004). The primary aim of his speech is to make individuals sympathetic to japanese people and interpret terrorist acts as protests towards oppression.

In his speech the chief of al-Qaida presents Bush and the American nation as anti-democratic invasors not giving proof to help his position. He accuses Bush of hiding true details about these tragic events: “Bush continues to be engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the true causes. And thus, the explanations are still there for a repeat of what occurred” (Bin Laden, 2004). He states that only he can inform people the real causes: “I shall tell you in truth concerning the moments in which the decision was taken, so that you can contemplate” (Bin Laden, 2004).

He uses rhetorical questions: “Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in type, objectionable terrorism?” Such questions, that are oriented on human understanding and sympathy, help him to assist his position and make it evident for other people. He also makes use of inaccurate figures presenting them as statistics, for instance, the determine of victims in Iraq, though this data does not coincide with official data.

Another distinctive feature of Bin Laden’s speech is its spiritual background. He refers to Allah all the time: “All Praise is due to Allah… Allah keen, and nothing is just too great for Allah” (Bin Laden, 2004) emphasizing that all the things is done within the name of Allah and by His authority.

Osama Bin Laden is a grasp of rhetoric; he uses its strategies perfectly. His speech is oriented on frequent people, who've youngsters and who care about their family. Hearing that thousands of harmless youngsters and ladies died in Lebanon and Iraq folks start sympathizing these individuals and supporting Osama Bin Laden. His speech is carefully thought-out and every word has its value. He uses inaccurate data and false argumentation with a purpose to assist his point of view. He uses solely those details which can be applicable for him. All in all, his speech, having a rational ground, is based on exaggerated info that create in people’s minds false understanding of events. He accuses America in anti-democratic behaviour and justifies his own Al-Qaida’s terrorist actions in such a way. His speech is a vibrant example of persuasive rhetorical speech.

Originally of his presidential marketing campaign Bush promised to extend the extent of Social Security in the nation and continue American democratic mission in Iraq. Bush positioned the emphasis on each social and financial spheres and international politics and at the similar time he planed to carry out a reform in education. President Bush focused his attention on schooling as a result of it's the assure of the certified and professional workers and financial progress of the nation, as a result. “President Bush vowed to push a “reform agenda” for education in his second time period that may prolong his educational accountability program often known as No Baby Left Behind to the highschool degree and develop access to school by reforming the monetary help system” (Tokaji, 2005). Bush was going to give every individual a risk to get an adequate education.

His average speech quickly got new shades of that means after the terrorist assault of September eleven, 2001. The reply to the occasions of September eleven, 2001 was the so-referred to as “Conflict on terror” proclaimed by George W. Bush. The main purpose of which was to unit enormous number of folks and cease acts of terror not just in the USA however all around the world. However, to exterminate the evil by one other evil is unimaginable, and taking united aggressive actions against acts of terror can do noting. President Bush announced after the occasions of the September eleven in regards to the terrorist assault: “on a scale that has created a state of armed battle that requires the usage of the United States Armed Forces. He additionally expressed an opinion that “there's a necessity in effective conduct of navy operations and prevention of military attacks, which makes it possible to detain certain non-residents and if crucial, to strive them for violations of the laws of conflict and different relevant legal guidelines by army tribunals” (Elsea, 2001). All the assaults will likely be treated just like the acts of struggle however not like criminal acts and react accordingly. Such a coverage makes it attainable to regard any assaults as a violation of the international legislation of battle and offers the US an opportunity to prosecute “terrorists” by means of the particular navy commission with out the federal court.

As we will see Bush’s rhetoric is based on the makes an attempt to make people afraid of terrorism. He uses different arguments with the intention to persuade folks that folks of Arabic world are dangerous. He confronts different nations and uses hatred and fear as a method to control the minds of people. These days Bush is called a very successful and effective orator. Earlier than presidential election of 2004 many people had doubts in his capacity to specific his thoughts and, thus, current the nation on the world arena. The scenario had changed earlier than the elections and nowadays Bush is one of the most effective orators of the world. Such a change in the angle of media and wide public to the president can't be explained only by the improvement of his rhetoric skills. The growth of popularity of Bush will be defined by the successful selection of devices to affect the minds of people. He makes use of loud names, blaming terrorism, resembling ‘Enemies of freedom, “enemies of our nation”, “enemies of democracy”, etc. and these clichés regularly develop into reflected in the minds of people. At this time moment for the Americans the word Arab turned a synonym for the phrase “enemy”. Bush’s speeches contain plenty of such references. For example, “Enemies of freedom committed an act of warfare against our nation”, ‘Thousands of dangerous killers… are now unfold all through the world like ticking time bombs,” “The Taliban in Afghanistan. Absolutely. Repressive” and plenty of other similar phrases are used as set expressions. Now such phrases introduced in his speeches don't want any specifications. Folks perceive that Bush speaks about terrorists and folks also perceive that Bush assumes that every one Arabian inhabitants consists of terrorists only. Such generalizations have double effect. From the one facet they're used to boost hatred to different nations and from the opposite facet they create panics and provoke concern in people. People who find themselves scared are easier to manipulate and Bush is completely conscious of this fact. Sadly, concern turns into one among his foremost weapons and his speeches are created in such a approach that this concern grows with the stream of time.

In his speeches Bush places much effort so as to justify American battle actions all around the world. The specter of terrorism becomes an object of speculation. After the unhappy occasions of September 11, 2001 people grew to become easier to affect and this worry is used by the government. Bush reminds individuals concerning the necessity to fight so as to save the democratic ideals and save their lives. Same as Bin Laden, Bush turns to blaming other part. All the time Bush underlines the need to “battle the enemy” and “defend our country”. He goes even additional and using the fear and anger of people, he persuades them that the struggle can be lengthy. As he states, “Americans shouldn't anticipate one battle, however a prolonged campaign, in contrast to another we now have ever seen” (Bush). His well-known saying “Our nation is at conflict”, proclaimed after the tragedy of September eleven grew to become the core assertion, which explains the state policy. Within the Congress session quickly after the tragedy Bush proclaimed that “enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our nation”. Statements like this regularly persuade folks within the necessity to fight the entire nation. From the other side no one mentions that terrorists who dedicated an attack September 11 didn't specific the will of the entire country. From the historical and political programs we all know that beginning a struggle is a prerogative of the country. Since this doesn't occurred with the U.S. the terrorist assault was used as a pretext to accuse the entire country.

Rhetoric of worry and anger proves to be an effective one. It is hard to imagine that people will observe leader, who promises them warfare and fighting with other countries. Alternatively, this is the factor which happens within the U.S. at present moment. Individuals support Bush, who bases his rhetoric on the need of war. His speeches are combined is such a approach that folks don't doubt a threat of terrorism any more. They see it as an actual risk and assume solely about the methods to combat it. It turns into even stunning that your complete nation is not only ready to participate in the struggle, but in addition agrees to stay in the state of warfare for an uncertain time. As Bush proclaims, “Our struggle on terror… is not going to end until each terrorist group of global attain has been found, stopped, and defeated” and in addition “People shouldn't anticipate one battle, but a prolonged campaign, not like some other we've ever seen” (Bush) and such calls seem to fulfill people. The reason of such obedience is fear. Fixed mentioning about the specter of terror makes individuals desperate to cease this threat as a way to save their lives.

Despite Bush and Bin Laden current fundamentally totally different social, political and philosophical programs, they use related tools of their rhetoric. They blame other sides and create an atmosphere of worry and anger among their citizens. Both, Bush and Bin Laden insist that they possess the only true information on the subject and seek advice from different facet solely like “enemies”. As states Bruce Lincoln, Professor of the History of Religions within the Divinity College of the College of Chicago: “Each males construct a Manichaean wrestle, the place Sons of Gentle confront Sons of Darkness, and all should enlist on one facet or another, without possibility of neutrality, hesitation, or center ground” (Lincoln, 112). They make a division of your entire world into these, who help them and those, who stands against them. They each use worry as means to control the minds of individuals and make individuals observe their ideals.